Not all lying is protected by the Constitution. But some of the fabrications by Rep. George Santos, experts say, are not likely a crime on their own.
Author: John Fritze, USA TODAY
As Supreme Court takes up Google case, only Clarence Thomas has made his thoughts clear
A case about whether Google’s algorithms are shielded from legal liability is the first dealing with the Section 230 to be heard by the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court to decide how far employers must go to accommodate workers’ religious beliefs
Gerald Groff, a former mail carrier in Pennsylvania, sued the U.S. Postal Service after it required him to work Sunday shifts delivering packages.
Supreme Court allows provisions of New York’s new gun law to remain in place for now
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed the law after a Supreme Court ruling in June made it far easier for many Americans to carry handguns in public.
Chief Justice Roberts pauses lifting of Title 42, keeping migrant policy in place for now
Title 42 has been used to expel migrants more than 2.4 million times since 2020. GOP-led states want to require the Biden administration to continue.
Appeals court clears the way to end removal of migrants under Title 42, setting up Supreme Court review
At issue is a Trump-era policy known as Title 42 that permits the rapid expulsion of migrants over public health concerns because of COVID-19.
Military interests parachute into Supreme Court cases on LGBTQ rights, elections
Does the Supreme Court give special deference to briefs from groups representing the military or former generals? It depends on the case, experts say.
Supreme Court takes up second case on Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan
The latest emergency appeal from the Biden administration means there are now two separate cases on the loan forgiveness plan at the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court to hear First Amendment case of man who promised immigrants path to citizenship
The case arrives at the Supreme Court two years after the justices settled a similar dispute over the immigration law on procedural grounds.
‘Big consequences’: Supreme Court grapples with case some warn could upend federal elections
Voting rights groups say the case could upend federal elections but others say state courts have overstepped their authority over voting laws.